Identifying biochemical and anatomical markers for resistance in grape, almond, and pistachio wood

Rolshausen_picPhilippe E. Rolshausen

Rohslausen discusses how cell wall chemical composition and differences in wood anatomy could be responsible for variance in susceptibility between different cultivars.

Link to the presentation: “Identifying biochemical and anatomical markers of resistance in grape, almond & pistachio wood

Detection of trunk pathogen inoculum in young vineyards to encourage adoption of preventative practices.

Lawrence.screenshotDaniel Lawrence

Objectives are:
-Possible pathogen detection tools for growers.
-Evaluate and improve culture and molecular detection methods.
-Promote preventative practices to minimize pruning wound infections.
-Develop prediction models to improve decision making processes for pruning times and possible treatments.

Link to the presentaiton: “Detection of trunk pathogen inoculum in young vineyards to encourage adoption of preventative practices

2014 Board Meeting -Renaud Travadon & Kendra Baumgartner

BaumgartnerTravadon_GrapeGermplasm.picRenaud Travadon & Kendra Baumgartner

Developing rapid grapevine screening process to identify wine and table grape cultivars for resistance to Eutypa Dieback based on foliar and woody symptoms. Future efforts towards comparing gene expression profile between previously characterized resistance and susceptible cultivars.

Based on previously discovered Phomopsis resistant genes, determine if woody tissue resistant genes can be linked to green tissue symptom expression.

Determine how anatomical and chemical differences effect Botryosphaeria resistance levels in 7 table grape cultivars.

Link to the presentation: “Baumgartner and Travadon presentation for the board meeting 2014”

 

Host-based molecular markers for early detection of infection

  • Goal– To determine if host-based molecular markers are unique to a particular pathogen
  • Activities – Identification of which pathogens are present in grapevine wood

Host marker 1Host marker 2Water stress4 Results and Outputs – Utilize qPCR to detect differential expression of target genes Water stress 6Significant Outcomes & Impacts – Identification of which pathogens are present in nursery stock grapevine wood. Eliminate contaminated stocks that would otherwise be used for propagation.

Water stress and infection

Goal– To determine if water stress exacerbates infection and test specificity of host-based markers to infection

Activities – Identification of host-based markers specific to infection and water stress

Water stress2water stress 1 Water stress3Two watering regimes tested:

  1. Well-watered control
  2. Severe water stress (16-17 bars leaf water potential)

Three inoculation regimes tested:

  1. NINW: non-inoculated non-wounded
  2. NIW: non-inoculated wounded
  3. IW: inoculated wounded

 

Water stress4

Results & Outputs – To understand how abiotic stress can influence disease progression and to validate molecular marker specificity to Neofusicoccumparvum.

Water stress 5Water stress 6

Identification of new anatomical and biological resistance markers

Goal – Identify new anatomical and biochemical markers of resistance in grapevine wood.

Activities – Characterize changes in the wood that correspond to resistance to Eutypa dieback, using cultivars with known resistance/tolerance: Merlot (resistant), Cabernet Sauvignon (intermediate), and Thompson seedless (susceptible).

3.2

Results & Outputs – Identified differences in cell wall and xylem characteristics. Susceptible tablegrape Thompson seedless had low lignin and high glucan in its cell walls, whereas resistant winegrape Merlot had high lignin and low glucan (Cabernet Sauvignon was intermediate). Xylem vessel diameter also differed between these two cultivars; Thompson seedless had the largest vessels and Merlot had the smallest.

Significant Outcomes & Impacts – These markers of Eutypa resistance will compliment the detached-cane screening method, to provide additional measures of resistance. This is important because we are evaluating genetically-diverse germplasm, which may exhibit different modes of resistance. These markers are now being evaluated for the other trunk diseases (Botryosphaeria dieback, Esca, Phomopsis dieback), along with the detached-cane method of screening.

Accurate identification of trunk fungi

Goal 2 – Accurate identification of trunk fungi

Activities – Allow for proper disease management and control practices

1.5

Results & Outputs – Developed a comprehensive DNA sequence database of trunk inhabiting fungi

1.6 1.7

Significant Outcomes & Impacts – Accurate species identification will lead to proper disease management practices.

Pistachio Cultivar Selection

Goal – Identify new commercial cultivars with resistance to the most aggressive causal agents of Panicle blight of pistachio.

Activities
Evaluated resistance in all susceptible tissues (green tissues: panicles & fruit, woody tissues: stem) with the three most aggressive pathogens (Botryosphaeria dothidea, Neofusicoccum mediterraneum, and Lasiodiplodia citricola), either alone or in combination.  Inoculations were done on mature trees in an experimental orchard.

3.7

3.8

3.9

Results & Outputs
To identify resistant germplasm, stem inoculations are required.  Inoculation of green tissues leads to blighted panicles and fruit. However, results were not different among cultivars and all three pathogen species colonized equally. In contrast, inoculation of stems lead to cankers of different lengths, depending on the cultivar and the pathogen.

Kerman, which makes up >90% of California pistachio acreage, showed an intermediate level of resistance, with cankers ranging from 5 to 20 cm. Even more resistant (i.e., with smaller cankers) were new cultivars Golden Hills, Lost Hills, and Randy. New cultivars Kalehghouchi, Joley, and Aria were most susceptible than Kerman. Among the pathogens, Lasiodiplodia citricola was the most aggressive species (i.e., caused the largest cankers) on all seven cultivars, including Kerman.

Significant Outcomes & Impacts
Several new cultivars – Golden Hills, Lost Hills – are more resistant than Kerman. The inoculation method we developed will be important for evaluating preventative fungicides, esp. given that even the most resistant cultivars still develop cankers.

Infection in Almonds

Goals– To identify rates of wood-canker infections within almond orchards, determine management practices, identify the pathogens present in the orchard, and climate conditions conducive for sporulation in order to increase orchard 

Activities
Identification and surveying of infested orchards, isolation and identification of wood canker fungi, and spore trapping.

3.5s

3.6

Results & Outputs
Identified pruning wounds, growth cracks, and wood breakage serve as primary points of infection. Found that spore trapping of wood canker fungi is in association with rain events. Successfully extended these initial findings to almond growing clientele in CA.

Significant Outcomes & Impacts
Development of a preliminary model and management practices from field observations and spore trappings.

Almond Resistant Cultivar Selection

Goal – Identify almond cultivars with resistance to the most aggressive causal agents of wood-canker diseases of almond: Band canker and Lower limb dieback.

Activities – Compared virulence of two Neofusicoccum species inoculated to the woody stems of potted almond plants.

3.3

3.4

Results & Outputs
Peerless was the most resistant to both species of the pathogen. Carmel, Sonora, and Padre were among most susceptible, with some differences depending on the species. Susceptible cultivars had the highest mortality. Cankers were so severe in Sonora that 50% of the trees died after 10 months. This means that infections of young trees, esp. of susceptible cultivars, must be protected in young orchards.

Significant Outcomes & Impacts
Now that we know the causal agents, we must identify preventative practices.